An appraiser deducts $5,000 for defective wiring classified as curable obsolescence. This defect is fixable if:

Study for the National Valuation Exam. Utilize multiple choice questions and detailed explanations. Master your exam with ease and confidence!

Multiple Choice

An appraiser deducts $5,000 for defective wiring classified as curable obsolescence. This defect is fixable if:

The correct response emphasizes the concept of curable obsolescence in property appraisal. Curable obsolescence refers to a deficiency or depreciation in a property's value that can be remedied at a reasonable cost, enhancing the property's overall market worth. In this context, for the appraiser to deduct $5,000 for defective wiring and classify it as curable obsolescence, the cost to repair the defect needs to be less than or equal to the value lost due to the defect. If the repair costs $4,000, which is less than the $5,000 lost in value, it makes financial sense to proceed with the repair, as it will restore value to the property exceeding the cost of the repair. By contrast, if the repair cost was higher than the deducted amount—like $6,000—the expense would not justify the improvement, leading to a situation where the defect could not be considered curable from an economic perspective. Therefore, the distinction lies in the relationship between the cost of repair and the value lost, making the completion of the repair economically justifiable when it is $4,000.

The correct response emphasizes the concept of curable obsolescence in property appraisal. Curable obsolescence refers to a deficiency or depreciation in a property's value that can be remedied at a reasonable cost, enhancing the property's overall market worth.

In this context, for the appraiser to deduct $5,000 for defective wiring and classify it as curable obsolescence, the cost to repair the defect needs to be less than or equal to the value lost due to the defect. If the repair costs $4,000, which is less than the $5,000 lost in value, it makes financial sense to proceed with the repair, as it will restore value to the property exceeding the cost of the repair.

By contrast, if the repair cost was higher than the deducted amount—like $6,000—the expense would not justify the improvement, leading to a situation where the defect could not be considered curable from an economic perspective. Therefore, the distinction lies in the relationship between the cost of repair and the value lost, making the completion of the repair economically justifiable when it is $4,000.

More practice questions